[DOWNLOAD] "Matter Patricia Canava Et Al." by Supreme Court of New York * Book PDF Kindle ePub Free
eBook details
- Title: Matter Patricia Canava Et Al.
- Author : Supreme Court of New York
- Release Date : January 03, 1978
- Genre: Law,Books,Professional & Technical,
- Pages : * pages
- Size : 59 KB
Description
[62 A.D.2d 997 Page 997] Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated March 30, 1977, which, after a hearing, directed that petitioners Canava, Messina, Rohrbach, Lascherand De Graff be placed on the promotional list for the position of recreation center manager and that petitioner Drommerhauser be placed on the promotional list for the position of assistant recreation center manager. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and proceeding dismissed on the merits. Each of the petitioners was provisionally appointed, after a job survey, either as recreation center manager (Canava, De Graff, Lascher and Rohrbach) or assistant recreation center manager (Messina and Drommerhauser). Prior to these appointments, the petitioners had performed the duties of a recreation center manager under various titles. Notice of open-competitive and promotional examinations for the positions of recreation center manager (manager) and assistant recreation center manager (assistant manager) was given. To qualify for the promotional examination for manager, continuous service was required for at least one year in the permanent position of either senior recreation leader or assistant recreation center manager, or two years in the permanent position of recreation leader; to qualify for the promotional examination for assistant manager, at least one year of continuous service was required in the permanent position of recreation leader. Petitioners Canava, Messina, Rohrbach, Lascher and De Graff were notified that they were qualified to take the open-competitive, but not the promotional, examination for manager. Petitioner Drommerhauser was notified that he was qualified to take the open-competitive, but not the promotional, examination for assistant manager. As to each title, the same examination was to be given for both the open-competitive and promotional lists. Special Term permitted petitioners to take the examinations, but stayed publication of the results thereof pending a hearing to determine whether they were [62 A.D.2d 997 Page 998]